FROM THE EDITOR
When an economy begins to slacken, it is common for people to hastily blame their government. This is rather simplistic. Economies move in cycles and whilst governments and central banks can nudge things one way or another, longer-term growth requires structural adjustments. Governments, though, have the ability to create a feel good factor that motivates consumer spending, for instance through lower taxes; and central banks through lower interest rates. But ultimately growth is a consequence of new investment and demand. Governments can play a role in both areas but cannot flap a magic wand.
There is no single solution to fixing the current state of affairs. Longer term reforms must be complemented with short term feel good measures.
The current slowdown is due to a combination of a few factors. First, rural incomes have been stagnant for the past few years. According to a report by the Reserve Bank of India, rural earnings soared by 15-17% pa between 2007 and 2013 and consequently, so did consumption. Thereafter, through to 2017-18, earnings slumped to around 6% pa with a resulting shock to a range of products, including consumer goods and farm equipment. Although inflation also fell during this period the drop in wages was far higher. Second, urban incomes failed to keep pace with their previous growth, largely an outcome of an absence of sizeable investments in manufacturing – new capacities create new jobs and consequently a new set of consumers. Whilst urban consumption has been climbing over the past three years, so has the quantum of consumer imports, mainly from China. For instance, 60% of India’s electronic imports come from China. Therefore, the marginal rise in demand has not really helped Indian manufacturers. The Indian corporate sector, refraining from investments in their own country, preferred manufacturing commitments in offshore locations. Whilst the growth in services, such as retail and logistics, created a tangible number of new jobs, most of these complemented a rise in consumer goods and electronics imports. For instance, electronic imports have jumped by about 16% pa in the last two years, capital goods by ~17% pa, toys 15% pa; apparel 35% pa and fertilisers by 27%.
Equity markets need to be buoyant, as they are a source of capital for business enterprise. They also generate private consumption through the ‘wealth effect’.
Third, the shrinking of retail credit influenced the purchase of products that cost more than Rs 15,000. Banks and NBFCs that provide such loans are themselves in dire straits. In the wake of the IL&FS crisis, the balance sheets of NBFCs came under scrutiny with fewer lines of credit from traditional lenders such as mutual funds and banks. Dodgy loan exposures amongst NBFCs aggregate to Rs 2 trillion or thereabouts. Commercial banks, themselves, need to fix their balance sheets and this requires unaffordable sums for recapitalisation. Finally, urban consumption complements a feel-good factor. When stock markets are buoyant people feel happy about their notional wealth. On the other hand when markets deflate, they become cautious. Stock values have collapsed by more than Rs 10 trillion over the past few weeks, providing a setback to retail spending. The sectors most likely to be impacted would be tourism, automobiles, consumer durables and really anything that is considered discretionary.
The issue now is how does one fix this? Regrettably, there is no plain solution. As a start, the government needs to continue with its infrastructure spending that in turn would sustain longer term growth. In the short term though, a combination of tax incentives would be handy. These could cover both personal income taxes – to persuade consumption – as well as corporation tax to inspire new investments. Currently, the effective tax rate on businesses is around 48% or even higher, when dividend distribution levies and further taxes on individual shareholders on dividend incomes are included. Equity markets need to be buoyant, as they are a source of capital for business enterprise. They also generate private consumption through the ‘wealth effect’, which affects the bulk of India’s middle-classes. This can’t be all that hard to fix.
Adit Jain, Editor
In a time of dramatic change, leading Finance functions are moving fast to deliver value to their organisations. To do that, Finance must balance its key priorities: cost reduction, capital structuring, strong controls and efficient operations. Diageo India – part of the world’s leading premium spirits firm...
Pankaj Vasani, Executive President and Group CFO - South Asia
CFOs stand at the intersection of multiple functions and thus have a unique vantage point of the enterprise. Consequently, their roles are becoming increasingly aligned to business strategy – and that of the CEO.
In conversation with Sachin Kalbag, Executive Editor, Hindustan Times
With the BJP securing a huge electoral mandate, it has the opportunity to push through reforms in a host of policy areas, from agriculture and taxation to land, labour and capital markets. In this regard, many had expected the July Budget to mark the new government’s first real ‘statement of intent’.
In conversation with: Anand Kripalu, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Diageo India Arif Aziz, Chief Human Resource Officer, Diageo India
In 2013, when Anand Kripalu was inducted to head Diageo India, he faced serious challenges as to how to transform its corporate culture and improve its image. What he saw was a culture similar to that in many Indian companies...
In conversation with
Kedar Upadhye, Global CFO, Cipla; Manas Datta, CFO, Wockhardt; Manoj Tulsian, CFO, JMC Projects; Manoj Bhat, CFO, Tech Mahindra; Vinod Kumar, CFO&CHRO, Kirloskar Oil Engines
Looking back to how businesses have adopted technology over the last 20 years, it is often Finance that has taken a lead. Technology can transform the Finance function through improved planning and decision making, more streamlined processes and reduced resource utilisation.