FROM THE EDITOR
A quandary of conflicting interests is hard to resolve. There is debate within various sections of the government on whether to bring economic and trade issues into the equations that govern India’s China strategy. On the one hand, defence hawks are adamant that the approach should be all encompassing, with every aspect of the relationship under consideration. This would include security, respect for territorial boundaries, investment and trade. Public opinion may be biased towards this argument and some go so far as to suggest that the Government would appear weak if it continues to avoid a meaningful economic response. They argue how imprudent India must appear in a situation where the Chinese benefit from a USD 70 billion per annum export opportunity and yet continue to violate territorial integrities and the sanctity of international borders. The political fall-out for the ruling BJP could be damaging, as it would appear submissive and feeble.
On the other hand, there are pressures from certain ministries and lobby groups, which argue that the border situation should be resolved separately from trade and the two cannot be entangled. India is dependent on Chinese supplies, specifically in the electronics and communications sector. Trade restrictions will be domestically damaging. In addition, the bulk of India’s consumer electronics imports are from China. Joining this bandwagon are the start-up industries, which have received masses of Chinese venture capital. Apparently, 18 Indian unicorns out of 30 are Chinese funded.
India’s China strategy historically kept economic and trade issues separate from security considerations but this approach is now being questioned within sections of Government.
The fact is, recent encroachments aside – where China has once again, consistent with its tested salami tactics, occupied tracts of Indian territory – the bulk of the Aksai Chin region in Ladakh was occupied during the 1962 war and never returned. The current intrusions are surprisingly in areas that were not under dispute. The hawks argue that if India were to take the submissive posture then the Chinese would only feel encouraged to press further claims across a line of control that extends over thousands of kilometres. They further insist that even Nepal, now under a communist government, has upped the stakes on tiresome border issues, under Chinese persuasion.
The latest incursion is in an area that was not under dispute and defence hawks believe that a submissive posture would only encourage the Chinese to press further claims.
It is true that India cannot afford a conflict with China, whose defence budgets are several times higher and with better border infrastructure possesses an advantage. The impact on the economy, already reeling under the Covid 19 crisis, would be devastating. Foreign capital will panic and the rupee will collapse in the currency markets. Even a brief encounter will take a couple of years to recover from. Pacifists contend that with nuclear capability, things could quite easily go out of hand. Moreover, India would have to stand on its own and despite the global China aversion, none would actually come to help. Japan and Israel may provide some technical support but that is as much as India may legitimately expect.
Both New Delhi and Beijing understand the implications of a conflict and would take every step possible to diffuse the current tensions. In the longer term, the border dispute will continue through bilateral discussions although any resolution seems highly unlikely considering the matter remains unresolved for 60 years. Perhaps, the economic card would need to be played despite the costs, as it brings another angle to the table. As Edmund Burke, the eminent Anglo-Irish statesman said, ‘the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing’.
Adit Jain, Editor
More than almost anything else, Covid’s impact will be felt in terms of liquidity and the consequent financial distress. Amidst all the chaos, the CFO will play a central role in stabilising the business and positioning it to thrive when conditions improve.
Sujit Vaidya shares his journey and the lessons learnt along the way
Today’s CFO has a multi-faceted role and is expected to be a performance leader, a steward of control, a catalyst of change, an operator of efficiency and a strategist of growth.
Adit Jain, Chairman and Editorial Director, IMA India
Covid-19 is unlike any other recent crisis. So far, it has killed many more people than SARS did, and this time, the recovery will not be V-shaped but far more hesitant.
Mark Oliver, Founder of MarkTwo Consulting
In today’s tough times, CXOs must not only captain the ‘organisational ship’ from a long-term strategic point of view, but in the short-term, ensure that the ship stays afloat.
Ramesh Venkat, Founder and Managing Partner, Fairwinds Asset Managers
India’s financial sector, which was already grappling with NPAs to the tune of 12-13% of assets before Covid-19 hit, is likely to see these ratios worsen in the coming months.
Gautam Khanna, CEO, PD Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre
A crumbling economy, lengthy lockdowns, social distancing, a scramble to develop a vaccine, and varying perspectives on how to manage the crisis: there is much in common between today’s situation and the Spanish Flu of 1918, which killed millions.
Sandeep Chilana, Managing Partner, Chilana & Chilana Law Offices
The GST has remained a topic of debate and, in many cases, trauma compounded by frequent changes in tax rates, confusing and sometimes conflicting rules on input credit and the continuing threat of anti-profiteering action by the authorities.
Manish Sabharwal, Chairman and Co-founder of Teamlease Services
The Covid-19 crisis has unleashed mayhem on the world of business. While the initial response focussed on employee safety, supply chain disruptions and business continuity, the longer-term implications will be profound. Many companies have moved to complete, almost overnight, digital transformations that they may have been planning
Rajat Sethi, Advisor to the Chief Minister of Manipur and Senior Research Fellow, India Foundation
In managing a crisis like Covid, governments have no rule books to follow. In both scale and complexity, the challenge is unprecedented and the response must combine boldness and caution in equal parts. Narendra Modi’s government has imposed a strict, nationwide lockdown, which has been twice extended.
Richard Martin, Managing Director, IMA Asia
As Asia emerges from the shadow of Covid-19, there will be disparity in economic performance across the region. Some markets will count out stronger, others weaker. Over time, there will also be an economic and geopolitical ‘rebalancing’, not just within Asia, but between the region and the world at large.
Ananth Narayan, Associate Professor of Finance at SP Jain Institute of Management and Research
Unlike with the 2008-09 Global Financial Crisis (GFC), India entered the Covid-19 crisis on a weak footing. Growth was slowing, the fiscal position was precarious, a number of key sectors were distressed, as was the financial system.